From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2024 17:16:36 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] BreakingChanges: document upcoming change from "sha1" to "sha256" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Patrick Steinhardt writes: > I agree that explicitly mentioning (1) and (3) is sensible. Is the > second one important though given that this is about the default when > creating _new_ repositories? I don't think interop code is a requirement > to make "sha256" the default, is it? Let's drop (2) from the list, as I do not think there ever was a concensus on it, and also for the sake of brevity. Thanks.