Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] BreakingChanges: document that we do not plan to deprecate git-checkout

> Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
> 
> > +
> > +* git-restore(1) and git-switch(1) have been introduced as a replacement for
> > +  git-checkout(1). As git-checkout(1) is quite established, and as the benefit
> > +  of switching to git-restore(1) and git-switch(1) is contended, all three
> > +  commands will stay.
> 
> "As a replacement" is probably a bit different from the truth [*],
> but I suspect that the reason why they were introduced no longer has
> much relevance.  How about
> 
>     The features git-checkout(1) offers are covered by the pair of
>     commands git-restore(1) and git-switch(1).  Because the use of
>     git-checkout(1) is still widespread, and it is not expected that
>     this will change anytime soon.
> 
> or something (borrowing from your proposed log message)?