Re: More builtin git-am issues..
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Sep 5, 2015, 15:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqsi6sdgnm.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqwpw4dh4a.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> writes: > >> Why do we need a new rule? The old git-am had a logic that pleased >> everyone, and it must have been implemented somewhere. Shouldn't it be >> sufficient to just re-implement or re-use that logic? > ... > Perhaps we would need to tell has_conforming_footer() function who > the caller is, and use a different logic (i.e. "just re-implement") > when the caller is append_signoff().
Ah, I think I misunderstood you. "just re-implement" could be "not to use the existing helper used by other callers and instead do it manually all inside builtin/am.c", and I agree that it would be the safest way to go.