Re: [PATCH v4] promisor-remote: fix segfault when remote URL is missing
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 13, 2025, 17:23 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqsengondl.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqv7scq4iu.fsf@gitster.g>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
Show 6 quoted lines
> In any case, why do we want to keep these unconfigured remotes in > the list of candidate lop-remotes in the first place, and why do we > want to treat empty URLs as being so special, more special than say > a randomly misspelt URL? I think I asked these questions on the > previous round and I do not think I saw them addressed at all in > this round.
Ah, sorry, I saw this new round before seeing the response to v3 review, in which these are covered.