From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 17:23:50 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] promisor-remote: fix segfault when remote URL is missing
Message-ID: <xmqqsengondl.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqv7scq4iu.fsf@gitster.g>

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

> In any case, why do we want to keep these unconfigured remotes in
> the list of candidate lop-remotes in the first place, and why do we
> want to treat empty URLs as being so special, more special than say
> a randomly misspelt URL?  I think I asked these questions on the
> previous round and I do not think I saw them addressed at all in
> this round.

Ah, sorry, I saw this new round before seeing the response to v3
review, in which these are covered.