Re: [PATCH 2/2] t3404: add a test for the --gpg-sign option

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Jul 6, 2016, 19:02 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqqmvlusi7v.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1607061733200.6426@virtualbox>

Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:

Show 8 quoted lines

> Okay, so here is the deal: on the development machine where this was
> developed, I do not have gpg installed. So please take this test case just
> to make sure that things work as intended for the moment.
>
> Before sending the last rebase--helper patch series, I will make sure to
> add a real test that requires gpg, and submit that, too.
>
> Deal?

I do not particularly care if the latter one happens.

The only thing I care about is that the earlier round documents that we know we probably should test the real driving of the GPG program, but we deliberately do not do so in the series, and hint that such an enhancement can happen later.

That might even entice others to help writing a test or two ;-)