Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] repack: use tempfiles for signal cleanup
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Oct 23, 2022, 18:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqlep6fm5h.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <Y1VzPY4zQyZbVAsm@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Here's a patch on top of of jk/repack-tempfile-cleanup that adjusts the > test (and should make the immediate racy CI pain go away). It gives some > explanation why the third option isn't as interesting as you'd think. If > somebody later wants to add such a "pack-objects died" error, we can > adjust sigpipe handling there.
An extremely simplified alternative would be just to say ! instead of test_must_fail, which essentially is ok=anycrash ;-)
I did try the same exact patch before going to bed last night but t7700 somehow failed some other steps in my local tests and I gave up digging further X-<. One step at a time...
Will queue. Thanks.
Show 40 quoted lines
> -- >8 -- > Subject: [PATCH] t7700: annotate cruft-pack failure with ok=sigpipe > > One of our tests intentionally causes the cruft-pack generation phase of > repack to fail, in order to stimulate an exit from repack at the desired > moment. It does so by feeding a bogus option argument to pack-objects. > This is a simple and reliable way to get pack-objects to fail, but it > has one downside: pack-objects will die before reading its stdin, which > means the caller repack may racily get SIGPIPE writing to it. > > For the purposes of this test, that's OK. We are checking whether repack > cleans up already-created .tmp files, and it will do so whether it exits > or dies by signal (because the tempfile API hooks both). > > But we have to tell test_must_fail that either outcome is OK, or it > complains about the signal. Arguably this is a workaround (compared to > fixing repack), as repack dying to SIGPIPE means that it loses the > opportunity to give a more detailed message. But we don't actually write > such a message anyway; we rely on pack-objects to have written something > useful to stderr, and it does. In either case (signal or exit), that is > the main thing the user will see. > > Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> > --- > t/t7700-repack.sh | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/t/t7700-repack.sh b/t/t7700-repack.sh > index edcda849b9..9164acbe02 100755 > --- a/t/t7700-repack.sh > +++ b/t/t7700-repack.sh > @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ test_expect_success TTY '--quiet disables progress' ' > ' > > test_expect_success 'clean up .tmp-* packs on error' ' > - test_must_fail git \ > + test_must_fail ok=sigpipe git \ > -c repack.cruftwindow=bogus \ > repack -ad --cruft && > find $objdir/pack -name '.tmp-*' >tmpfiles &&