Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] ci: make Git's GitHub workflow output much more helpful

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: May 22, 2022, 19:10 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqqfsl1bcy6.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2205222045130.352@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>

Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:

Show 5 quoted lines

> I see that this is still with the previous iteration, and therefore
> exposes the same speed (or slowness) as was investigated so wonderfully by
> Victoria.
>
> So I really do not understand why you pointed to that run, given that it

Simply because your updated version came to my tree a lot after I prepared two trees that are otherwise identical for comparison to write the message you are responding to. If the new round is much improved than the previous one, that is a very good news.

I do not appreciate that you have to always talk back to others in such an aggressive tone, and I do not think it is only to me, by the way.

You could have said the same thing in a lot more cordial way, e.g. "There is a newer version than those being compared---could you look at this run instead for comparison, even though admittably there probably are changes in other topics in flight so the exact failures may be different?"