Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] ci: make Git's GitHub workflow output much more helpful

From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: May 23, 2022, 12:58 UTC
Message-ID: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2205231455200.352@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqfsl1bcy6.fsf@gitster.g>

Hi Junio,

On Sun, 22 May 2022, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Show 11 quoted lines

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
>
> > I see that this is still with the previous iteration, and therefore
> > exposes the same speed (or slowness) as was investigated so wonderfully by
> > Victoria.
> >
> > So I really do not understand why you pointed to that run, given that it
>
> Simply because your updated version came to my tree a lot after I
> prepared two trees that are otherwise identical for comparison to
> write the message you are responding to.

Oh sorry, I only noticed that your mail came in after I sent the new iteration, and I incorrectly thought that you had put the patch series into the Stalled/To-Drop pile, so I assumed that your mail was in response to my new iteration.

I had missed that you replied to v2 instead of to v3.

> I do not appreciate that you have to always talk back to others in
> such an aggressive tone

I apologize for that. As you might have guessed, it was not my intention to be aggressive in any way. I merely meant to express my puzzlement, and your explanation resolved that very nicely.

Thank you, Dscho