Re: [PATCH 0/9] ci: make Git's GitHub workflow output much more helpful

From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Feb 20, 2022, 15:25 UTC
Message-ID: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2202201623500.26495@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqtucuw93i.fsf@gitster.g>

Hi Junio,

On Sat, 19 Feb 2022, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Show 13 quoted lines

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
>
> > I notice that you did not take this into `seen` yet. I find that a little
> > sad because it would potentially have helped others to figure out the
> > failure in the latest `seen`:
> > https://github.com/git/git/runs/5255378056?check_suite_focus=true#step:5:162
> >
> > Essentially, a recent patch introduces hard-coded SHA-1 hashes in t3007.3.
>
> I saw the thread, I saw a few patches were commented on, and a few
> were left unanswered, but one was replied by the original submitter
> with a "Good catch!", making me expect the topic to be discussed or
> rerolled to become ready relatively soon.

Yes, I have local changes, but I had really hoped that this patch series would get a chance to prove its point by example, i.e. by offering the improved output for the failures in `seen`. I hoped that because I think that those improvements speak for themselves when you see them.

Ciao, Dscho