Re: [PATCH 05/83] builtin/apply: extract line_by_line_fuzzy_match() from match_fragment()
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Apr 26, 2016, 20:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqbn4wf7ft.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAP8UFD228joDLyomvae7rVs02TuTbmEHerwWvH=VR+FE-YFLRA@mail.gmail.com>
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com> writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
>> It's not clear why we need to declare buf here? Oh wait it is. It's just >> moved from the start of the function. But why do it in this patch? >> It seems unrelated to the general intent of the patch. No need to reroll >> for this nit alone, it just took me a while to figure out it was an unrelated >> thing. > > Yeah, I agree it's a bit unrelated. But rather than add another patch > to an already long series just for this,...
Isn't not doing the unrelated move at all a more sensible alternative, if that change does not deserve its own place in the series after all?