Re: [PATCH] contrib: add credential helper for libsecret
Dennis Kaarsemaker <dennis@kaarsemaker.net> writes:
Show 15 quoted lines
> On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 22:48 +0300, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
>> On 2016-10-11 22:36, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> > Thanks for a review. I'll wait until one of (1) a squashable patch
>> > to address the "we do not want unconditional overwrite" issue, (2) a
>> > reroll from Mantas to do the same, or (3) a counter-argument from
>> > somebody to explain why unconditional overwrite is a good idea here
>> > (but not in the original) appears.
>>
>>
>> I overlooked that. I can write a patch, but it shouldn't make any
>> difference in practice – if c->username *was* set, then it would also
>> get added to the search attribute list, therefore the search couldn't
>> possibly return any results with a different username anyway.
>
> Makes sense, so a (3) it is.
So... does it mean the gnome-keyring one needs a bugfix?