Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] PATH WALK I: The path-walk API
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Nov 26, 2024, 07:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqa5dmzboa.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <Z0Q7oGF6Q5U-f4VX@pks.im>
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> The question of course is whether these tools require the path-walk API, > or whether they could be built on top of existing functionality. But if > there are good reasons why the existing functionality is insufficient > then I'd be all for having the path-walk API, even if it doesn't help us > with repo size reductions as we initially thought.
Is the implied statement that we didn't quite see sufficient rationale to convince ourselves that a new path-walk machinery is needed?
Thanks.