Re: [PATCH 5/6] path-walk: visit tags and cached objects

From: karthik nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Date: Nov 1, 2024, 14:25 UTC
Message-ID: <CAOLa=ZR1BjKzujxpA2icAfJHin-krqwkxTf5VPeGg14AVr-TcQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3dc27658526784edf46f67661d1161a8eea3ea0a.1730356023.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>

"Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:

Show 10 quoted lines

> From: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
>
> The rev_info that is specified for a path-walk traversal may specify
> visiting tag refs (both lightweight and annotated) and also may specify
> indexed objects (blobs and trees). Update the path-walk API to walk
> these objects as well.
>
> When walking tags, we need to peel the annotated objects until reaching
> a non-tag object. If we reach a commit, then we can add it to the
> pending objects to make sure we visit in the commit walk portion. If we

Nit: s/in/it in/

[snip]

Show 14 quoted lines

> +		case OBJ_BLOB:
> +			if (!info->blobs)
> +				continue;
> +			if (pending->path) {
> +				struct type_and_oid_list *list;
> +				char *path = pending->path;
> +				if (!(list = strmap_get(&ctx->paths_to_lists, path))) {
> +					CALLOC_ARRAY(list, 1);
> +					list->type = OBJ_BLOB;
> +					strmap_put(&ctx->paths_to_lists, path, list);
> +				}
> +				oid_array_append(&list->oids, &obj->oid);
> +			} else {
> +				/* assume a root tree, such as a lightweight tag. */

Shouldn't this comment be for tagged blobs?

> +				oid_array_append(&tagged_blobs->oids, &obj->oid);
> +			}
> +			break;

[snip]