Re: [PATCH 0/5] sparse-index: improve clear_skip_worktree_from_present_files()
Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> writes:
Show 6 quoted lines
> But what you are really asking is how close this is to the optimal.
> I didn't include that in Patch 5 details, but I was able to look at
> my notes and see that the sparse_path_count data point was 1,962,
> meaning there are that many sparse trees in the sparse index before
> expanding. Thus, the 6,521 lstat() calls are 3.3x more than the
> absolute minimum required.
Nice, and still impressive. Thanks.