Re: [PATCH 2/2] Wait for child on signal death for aliases to externals
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Sorry that ended up so long-winded, but my conclusion is: this is doing
> the right thing. We should probably embed some of that discussion in the
> commit message, but I think the simplest argument is just: this is what
> we do for external commands we run, so treating shell aliases the same
> in terms of passing along signals makes things simple and consistent.
Thanks for a great analysis to help the author.