Re: [PATCH 1/2] Wait for child on signal death for aliases to builtins
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jul 7, 2020, 01:48 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq1rlo859k.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2007050410100.50@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
> Thank you for those references. I did try to make sure that b914084007 > would not regress on anything, but apparently I failed to verify the final > form. Since all it did was to remove `#if 0`...`#endif` guards, it was > unfortunately quite easy for this regression to slip in.
Yeah, I recall wondering why it was safe to suddenly enable the segment of the disabled code all of sudden.