Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] Maintenance IV: Platform-specific background maintenance
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Dec 10, 2020, 01:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq5z5azd2r.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAPig+cSciupmmupdgynfBO98EFke5fneC5W+k2vCo9Zkh3KF5w@mail.gmail.com>
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes:
Show 14 quoted lines
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 7:33 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: >> "Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes: >> > Update in V6 >> > ============ >> > >> > * The Windows platform uses the tempfile API a bit better, including using >> > the frequency in the filename to make the test simpler. >> >> Are two fix-up patches from Eric that have been queued near the top >> of ds/maintenance-part-4 still relevant? > > Both of the patches from Sunshine are still relevant atop Stolee's > latest (v6), and they should apply cleanly (I would think) since v6 > didn't change anything related to those patches.
Yup, I tried rebasing these two and they applied cleanly, so I'll include them in today's pushout (which I haven't finished yet).
I probably would not notice if the updated 4-patch series already solved the issue in another way without causing the textual conflict with your two fix-up patches, though ;-)
Thanks.