Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] maintenance: use launchctl on macOS
- From
Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 13, 2020, 20:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <d9c51446-c223-dce9-692a-959f841d506f@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAPig+cQQrucwE-KSndQ5kCjG9Q1MtjxraAmA95+OQe=6bdks-Q@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/13/2020 3:19 PM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
Show 33 quoted lines
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 9:00 AM Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
> <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> wrote:
>> [...]
>> The solution is to switch from cron to the Apple-recommended [1]
>> 'launchd' tool.
>> [...]
>> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/builtin/gc.c b/builtin/gc.c
>> @@ -1491,6 +1491,200 @@ static int maintenance_unregister(void)
>> +static int boot_plist(int enable, const char *filename)
>> +{
>> + struct child_process child = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
>> + child.no_stderr = 1;
>> + child.no_stdout = 1;
>> + if (start_command(&child))
>> + die(_("failed to start launchctl"));
>
> Not necessarily worth a re-roll -- in fact, it could be done atop this
> series to avoid holding this series up -- but this too-succinct error
> reporting won't help users diagnose the failure. An alternative would
> be to capture stdout and stderr and only print them if the command
> fails. Perhaps something like this:
>
> struct strbuf out = STRBUF_INIT;
> struct strbuf err = STRBUF_INIT;
> ...
> if (pipe_command(child, NULL, 0, &out, 0, &err, 0) {
> if (out.len && err.len)
> strbuf_addstr(&out, "; ");
> strbuf_addbuf(&out, &err);
> die(_("launchctl failed: %s"), out.buf);
> }We would also want to pass a "die_on_failure" into the method, since in the 'git maintenance start' case we don't want to report a failure when 'launchctl bootout' fails before we call 'launchctl bootstrap'.
Show 6 quoted lines
> By the way, won't this die() be a problem when schedule_plist() calls > boot_plist() to remove the old scheduled tasks before calling it again > to register the new ones? If the old ones don't exist, then it will > die() unnecessarily and never register the new ones. Or am I > misunderstanding? (I'm guessing that I must be misunderstanding since > the test script presumably passes.)
This die() is only if the process cannot _start_, for example due to launchctl not existing on $PATH. The result from finish_command() would be non-zero when we bootout a plist that doesn't exist.
Show 16 quoted lines
>> diff --git a/t/t7900-maintenance.sh b/t/t7900-maintenance.sh >> @@ -389,12 +389,54 @@ test_expect_success 'stop from existing schedule' ' >> +test_expect_success MACOS_MAINTENANCE 'start and stop macOS maintenance' ' >> + write_script print-args "#!/bin/sh\necho \$* >>args" && > > write_script() takes the script body as stdin, not as an argument, and > you don't need to specify /bin/sh. What you have here works by > accident only because write_script() takes an optional second argument > specifying the shell to use in place of the default /bin/sh. > Nevertheless, it should really be written: > > write_script print-args <<-\EOF > echo $* > EOF > > Patch [4/4] uses write_script() correctly.
Ah. Sorry for misunderstanding. That explains why it works this way on macOS but it did _not_ work that way on Windows.
Show 33 quoted lines
>> + rm -f args && >> + GIT_TEST_CRONTAB="./print-args" git maintenance start && >> + >> + # start registers the repo >> + git config --get --global maintenance.repo "$(pwd)" && >> + >> + # ~/Library/LaunchAgents >> + ls "$HOME/Library/LaunchAgents" >actual && > > Not sure what the comment above the `ls` is meant to be conveying. > Could be dropped but not itself worth a re-roll. > >> + cat >expect <<-\EOF && >> + org.git-scm.git.daily.plist >> + org.git-scm.git.hourly.plist >> + org.git-scm.git.weekly.plist >> + EOF >> + test_cmp expect actual && >> + >> + rm expect && >> + for frequency in hourly daily weekly >> + do >> + PLIST="$HOME/Library/LaunchAgents/org.git-scm.git.$frequency.plist" && >> + xmllint --noout "$PLIST" && >> + grep schedule=$frequency "$PLIST" && >> + echo "bootout gui/$UID $PLIST" >>expect && >> + echo "bootstrap gui/$UID $PLIST" >>expect || return 1 >> + done && > > This is still relying upon $UID picked up from the users environment > (as far as I can tell), which seems fragile. As mentioned in my first > review, it probably would be more robust to compute UID manually the > same way git-maintenance itself does.
Sorry, I missed this comment from v1 when reapplying the changes for v3.
Show 8 quoted lines
>> + test_cmp expect args && >> + >> + rm -f args && >> + GIT_TEST_CRONTAB="./print-args" git maintenance stop && > > Minor: No need for the quotes around ./print-args (though they don't > hurt either, and certainly not worth re-rolling just to drop them, and > it's subjective so don't drop them just for my sake).
Thank you for your continued attention and patience. -Stolee