Re: [PATCH] Also read SQUASH_MSG if a conflict on a merge squash occurred
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 8, 2016, 18:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq1t7kls58.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <56DF1EBD.8050503@cs-ware.de>
Sven Strickroth <sven@cs-ware.de> writes:
> Here hook_arg1 would be always "merge" and never "squash"... Before my > change it was only "squash" if no conflict occurred.
Oh, that wasn't an intended change. It was merely an illustration of a possible restructuring of the flow to avoid having to have identical read functions in two separate places.