From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 18:51:47 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] Also read SQUASH_MSG if a conflict on a merge squash occurred Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <56DF1EBD.8050503@cs-ware.de> Sven Strickroth writes: > Here hook_arg1 would be always "merge" and never "squash"... Before my > change it was only "squash" if no conflict occurred. Oh, that wasn't an intended change. It was merely an illustration of a possible restructuring of the flow to avoid having to have identical read functions in two separate places.