Re: An alternate model for preparing partial commits
- From
- David Jeske <jeske@willowmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 13, 2016, 23:23 UTC
- Message-ID
- <willow-jeske-01l7er6OFEDjCcEC>
- In-Reply-To
- <9af502e50806271555j3cd06ecau122b11217f612217@mail.gmail.com>
-- Robert Anderson wrote:
> Possibly a succinct way of moving this conversation forward is to say that: > > What is desired is a workflow where partial commits can be tested, > when it is desirable not to change history.
Why don't we just make a model where history changes are handled safetly? Then we don't have to be afraid to publish DAGs we may want to change later.