From: David Jeske Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 23:23:22 GMT Subject: Re: An alternate model for preparing partial commits Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <9af502e50806271555j3cd06ecau122b11217f612217@mail.gmail.com> -- Robert Anderson wrote: > Possibly a succinct way of moving this conversation forward is to say that: > > What is desired is a workflow where partial commits can be tested, > when it is desirable not to change history. Why don't we just make a model where history changes are handled safetly? Then we don't have to be afraid to publish DAGs we may want to change later.