Re: An alternate model for preparing partial commits
- From
- Robert Anderson <rwa000@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 28, 2008, 16:00 UTC
- Message-ID
- <9af502e50806280900m415eb354waee9edac91a70e8d@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <9b3e2dc20806280734i6ca17cc8i447c2e2db67e8051@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 7:34 AM, Stephen Sinclair <radarsat1@gmail.com> wrote:
> The answer is simple: you should not be making partial commits to a > repo that has been cloned. You should instead be working somewhere > else and then pushing to it. So this whole sentence is just a moot > point itself.
Ah, now you've hit the crux. Thank you for the "svn style" response here. I "should not" because git has a deficiency. Absolutely no other reason.
Thanks, Bob