Re: An alternate model for preparing partial commits

From: Dmitry Potapov <dpotapov@gmail.com>
Date: Jun 28, 2008, 16:52 UTC
Message-ID: <20080628165208.GN5737@dpotapov.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <9af502e50806280853i4c8564daxde2041aedc7fcb8d@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 08:53:04AM -0700, Robert Anderson wrote:

Show 7 quoted lines

> On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 5:35 AM, Dmitry Potapov <dpotapov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Fine, you like doing extra work for no benefit.  Enjoy yourself.
> >
> > I don't see where you find this extra work.
> 
> You aren't trying to.  You're knee-jerk defending the status quo, as
> is the case of 95% of reply mail sent to any SCM mailing list.

Nice... and you are an arrogant and narrow-minded individual who believes that he knows better anyone else, but you are incapable to produce neither code nor any solid logical argument to support your view. So you limit yourself to verbal masturbation about some Git deficiency and blah-blah-blah, which no one but you can notice here. And then the workflow that you call you call as "inconvenient and creates redundant work" produced Git, which has become self-hosted in three days and has been developed very rapidly ever since then. You can do better with your workflow? Prove it! Until then, I have no interest in any further communication on this subject with you.

Thanks, Dmitry