Re: An alternate model for preparing partial commits
- From
- Robert Anderson <rwa000@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 27, 2008, 18:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <9af502e50806271107m18dfb300mfed0e2aa401cc8d9@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0806271854120.9925@racer>
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> Hi, > > On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Robert Anderson wrote: > >> Here's a patch to match the local culture: "It is incredible how stupid >> the idea of the index is." >> >> Clearly you should now be interested. > > No, you're wrong. I am totall uninterested in talking to you now. >
Tongue in cheek, of course - a play on Linus' "narrow minded views" about svn. Not much of a sense of humor, eh?
You may consider the idea that the next committed state ought to be available for build/test to be a "narrow-minded" view. I find it to be a manifestly sound view. In fact, if you disagree I have little respect for your technical judgment and therefore am not concerned if you will not talk with me. Which is too bad on both counts.
Thanks, Bob