Re: [RFC/PATCH] rebase -i: add run command to launch a shell command
- From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
- Date
- Aug 3, 2010, 09:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <vpqzkx45a4k.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <AANLkTi=uPHiS2S2hR4=0oBC=s3SyEP_qo3+n8FNHkFEV@mail.gmail.com>
Kris Shannon <kris@shannon.id.au> writes:
Show 15 quoted lines
> On 31 July 2010 23:56, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 15:24, Matthieu Moy >> <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> wrote: >> > Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink.com> writes: >> > >> >>> The name of the command may be subject to discussions. I've chosen >> >>> "run", but maybe "shell" would be OK too. In both cases, it doesn't >> >>> allow the one-letter version since both "r" and "s" are already used. >> >> >> >> "exec" with one-letter "x"? >> > >> > Thanks, that sounds good, yes. Any other thought? >> >> I like "exec". > or (t)est.
testing is one possibility, but you may want to do other things, like
pick <commit> ... exec perl -pi -e 's/foo/bar/g' file.c; git add file.c; git commit --amend
or whatever. "exec" is definitely the best proposal.
-- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/