From: Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 09:16:43 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] rebase -i: add run command to launch a shell command
Message-ID: <vpqzkx45a4k.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=uPHiS2S2hR4=0oBC=s3SyEP_qo3+n8FNHkFEV@mail.gmail.com>

Kris Shannon <kris@shannon.id.au> writes:

> On 31 July 2010 23:56, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 15:24, Matthieu Moy
>> <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> wrote:
>> > Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink.com> writes:
>> >
>> >>> The name of the command may be subject to discussions. I've chosen
>> >>> "run", but maybe "shell" would be OK too. In both cases, it doesn't
>> >>> allow the one-letter version since both "r" and "s" are already used.
>> >>
>> >> "exec" with one-letter "x"?
>> >
>> > Thanks, that sounds good, yes. Any other thought?
>>
>> I like "exec".
> or (t)est.

testing is one possibility, but you may want to do other things, like

pick <commit> ...
exec perl -pi -e 's/foo/bar/g' file.c; git add file.c; git commit --amend

or whatever. "exec" is definitely the best proposal.

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/