Re: [PATCH v2] push: point to 'git pull' and 'git push --force' in case of non-fast forward
- From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@imag.fr>
- Date
- Aug 10, 2009, 08:56 UTC
- Message-ID
- <vpqbpmo59np.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v1vnk3vgc.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
Show 14 quoted lines
> Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> writes: > >> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes: >> >>> If you read "Integrate them with your changes" and understand that it is >>> talking about "git pull" or "git pull --rebase", then you do not have to >>> read the doc. It should "click". >> >> But what's the point is being so vague, while you could just add "(see >> git pull)"? See what you've just wrote: one should "understand that it >> is about ...". So, why write Y thinking that the user should >> understand that it is about X while you could write X directly? > > In order to cover both "pull" and "pull --rebase"?
"git pull" also covers both. "pull" is the command, "--rebase" is an option of it.
-- Matthieu