Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] Add Travis CI support
- From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
- Date
- Oct 15, 2015, 17:14 UTC
- Message-ID
- <vpq7fmoyryw.fsf@grenoble-inp.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.1510151247550.31610@s15462909.onlinehome-server.info>
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2015, Matthieu Moy wrote: > >> Since the tests are essentially IO-bound and not CPU-bound, it may even >> make sense to use -j3 here. > > I would like to caution against overloading Travis. They are really nice > to us, we should try to be nice to them, too.
Right.
Using a bit of parallelism shouldn't harm (we put a heavier load on them, but for a shorter time), so using -j2 or -j3 seems OK to me, but I wouldn't go higher to remain gentle with Travis CI.
Note: I'm writting this without having a real idea of what consequence of -jN have on their infrastructure, take my writing as wild guess, not as real arguments.
-- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/