Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2009, #04; Wed, 21)
- From
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 22, 2009, 11:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <fcaeb9bf0910220415v69c22ed9o4ab85b8858fbf187@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <m3ljj3es02.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 23 quoted lines
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes: >> * nd/sparse (2009-08-20) 19 commits. >> - sparse checkout: inhibit empty worktree >> - Add tests for sparse checkout >> - read-tree: add --no-sparse-checkout to disable sparse checkout support >> - unpack-trees(): ignore worktree check outside checkout area >> - unpack_trees(): apply $GIT_DIR/info/sparse-checkout to the final index >> - unpack-trees(): "enable" sparse checkout and load $GIT_DIR/info/sparse-checkout >> - unpack-trees.c: generalize verify_* functions >> - unpack-trees(): add CE_WT_REMOVE to remove on worktree alone >> - Introduce "sparse checkout" >> - dir.c: export excluded_1() and add_excludes_from_file_1() >> - excluded_1(): support exclude files in index >> - unpack-trees(): carry skip-worktree bit over in merged_entry() >> - Read .gitignore from index if it is skip-worktree >> - Avoid writing to buffer in add_excludes_from_file_1() >> - Teach Git to respect skip-worktree bit (writing part) >> - Teach Git to respect skip-worktree bit (reading part) >> - Introduce "skip-worktree" bit in index, teach Git to get/set this bit >> - Add test-index-version >> - update-index: refactor mark_valid() in preparation for new options > > Hmmm... what is happening with that series?
Junio concerned about CE_MATCH_IGNORE_VALID being used by both assume-unchanged and skip-worktree bits, which I did not resolve yet. I should really get back to the series when I have time.
-- Duy