Re: [PATCH 01/10] "git read-tree -m" and the like require worktree
- From
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 11, 2008, 15:41 UTC
- Message-ID
- <fcaeb9bf0803110841h54899919kba1bfa15ccc06843@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LSU.1.00.0803111605530.3873@racer.site>
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:06 PM, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
Show 19 quoted lines
> Hi, > > > On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Johannes Schindelin > > <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote: > > > > > > How about > > > > > > git read-tree -m without -i requires work tree > > > > > > Hmm? > > > > I thought that was the patch was about. Did I write the patch so bad? :( > > I meant as a replacement for your commit subject (which I found pretty > hard to understand, harder than the patch itself).
Yes it is absolutely a better subject. Thanks.
-- Duy