Re: [PATCH] Do check_repository_format() early
- From
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 28, 2007, 17:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <fcaeb9bf0711280924v34160eddsf8a75f8f8cee389c@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711281717460.27959@racer.site>
On Nov 29, 2007 12:18 AM, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
Show 35 quoted lines
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
>
> > On Nov 29, 2007 12:05 AM, Johannes Schindelin
> > <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
> > >
> > > > @@ -246,8 +246,13 @@ const char *setup_git_directory_gently(int *nongit_ok)
> > > > static char buffer[1024 + 1];
> > > > const char *retval;
> > > >
> > > > - if (!work_tree_env)
> > > > - return set_work_tree(gitdirenv);
> > > > + if (!work_tree_env) {
> > > > + retval = set_work_tree(gitdirenv);
> > > > + /* config may override worktree */
> > > > + check_repository_format();
> > > > + return retval;
> > > > + }
> > > > + check_repository_format();
> > >
> > > Why not move this check before the if? Other than that, ACK.
> >
> > If so it would be called twice if work_tree_env is not set.
>
> Well, I would have left the original
>
> if (!work_tree_env)
> return set_work_tree(gitdirenv);
>
> alone...
>
> If that is not possible, it might be good to add a comment as to why.I did, and the tests failed. I also added a comment "config may override worktree". set_work_tree() will reset git_work_tree_cfg but the correct behaviour is config takes precedence (from comment of set_work_tree). The comment is clearly not clear enough. Maybe this?
+ if (!work_tree_env) {
+ retval = set_work_tree(gitdirenv);
+ /* config may override worktree (see
set_work_tree comment) */
+ check_repository_format();
+ return retval;
+ }> Ciao, > Dscho > >
-- Duy