Re: [PATCH] send-email: don't cc *-by lines with '-' prefix
- From
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
- Date
- Mar 16, 2019, 19:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <fc14d671d5c3ff43fc43095930d4c762fe6f5002.camel@perches.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <87zhpuzjke.fsf@tarshish>
On Sat, 2019-03-16 at 21:49 +0200, Baruch Siach wrote:
Show 17 quoted lines
> Hi Joe,
>
> On Sat, Mar 16 2019, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sat, 2019-03-16 at 21:26 +0200, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > > Since commit ef0cc1df90f6b ("send-email: also pick up cc addresses from
> > > -by trailers") in git version 2.20, git send-email adds to cc list
> > > addresses from all *-by lines. As a side effect a line with
> > > '-Signed-off-by' is now also added to cc. This makes send-email pick
> > > lines from patches that remove patch files from the git repo. This is
> > > common in the Buildroot project that often removes (and adds) patch
> > > files that have 'Signed-off-by' in their patch description part.
> >
> > Why is such a line used and why shouldn't an author
> > of a to-be-removed patch be cc'd?
>
> These lines are currently used because the '^([a-z-]*-by)' regexp
> matches.That part I already understood.
I am not a buildroot user.
Show 9 quoted lines
> Buildroot is a tool that build various software packages. The patches > being removed are usually for packages that Buildroot patches to fix the > build. These patches are often pulled from upstream git repo of > respective package. When the package version updates, the patch is > dropped. > > We don't cc patch authors when we add the patch in the first place, > because the regexp does not match '+Signed-off-by'. I see not reason to > cc them when we remove the patch.
So buildroot uses '+Signed-off-by:' and '-Signed-off-by:' lines for some internal purpose?
Why?
https://buildroot.org/downloads/manual/manual.html
doesn't mention it.