Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/8] rebase-interactive
- From
- Jeff Hostetler <git@jeffhostetler.com>
- Date
- Mar 27, 2018, 10:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <f655f5d3-9a8a-ead7-04b2-eda3c14ed8f5@jeffhostetler.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqy3ie9kdv.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
On 3/27/2018 1:07 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff Hostetler <git@jeffhostetler.com> writes:
[...]
> So I would think it is most sensible to have double, uintmax_t and > intmax_t variants. If you do not care about the extra value range > that unsigned integral types afford, a single intmax_t variant would > also be fine.
I'll reroll with just the double and intmax_t variants. Thanks for the feedback and sorry for all the noise.
Jeff