From: Jeff Hostetler <git@jeffhostetler.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 10:03:28 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/8] rebase-interactive
Message-ID: <f655f5d3-9a8a-ead7-04b2-eda3c14ed8f5@jeffhostetler.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqy3ie9kdv.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>



On 3/27/2018 1:07 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff Hostetler <git@jeffhostetler.com> writes:
[...]
> So I would think it is most sensible to have double, uintmax_t and
> intmax_t variants.  If you do not care about the extra value range
> that unsigned integral types afford, a single intmax_t variant would
> also be fine.

I'll reroll with just the double and intmax_t variants.
Thanks for the feedback and sorry for all the noise.

Jeff