git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: git-scm.com

From
Scott Chacon <schacon@gmail.com>
Date
Jul 26, 2008, 18:33 UTC
Message-ID
<d411cc4a0807261133w6f068176y5c4a23c887da8ed3@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<F3D70DCD-E9A9-42C3-8870-ABB7EECF83CC@wincent.com>
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com> wrote:
Show 24 quoted lines
> El 26/7/2008, a las 7:30, Scott Chacon escribió:
>
>> However, that being said, it's going to be difficult to have Github
>> projects not dominate the list a bit.  The fact is that it hosts far,
>> far more projects than any other single hosting service.  Just in
>> fully public projects, the current stats (from the website pages) are
>> something like this:
>>
>> kernel.org : 475
>> repo.or.cz : 1,553
>> gitorious   : 780
>> github       : 10,560
>>
>> It hosts far more than that if you include private projects, too.  So,
>> if we want to choose totally randomly, it's going to be at least a 5:1
>> ratio between github projects and all other public hosting providers.
>
>
> I think those numbers are pretty meaningless seeing as GitHub encourages
> people to publish "forks" of other projects. Rails, for example, has about
> 270 forks at the time of writing. If I scan the list of popular projects I
> see fork counts like 129, 105, 78 and 78 (again). Are all the forks counted
> in that figure of 10,560 that you count? How many "real" projects are hosted
> there?

Actually, no - I was including forked projects in the repo.or.cz count and _not_ including forks in the github count. The actual apples to apples count is :

Unique Projects:
  repo.or.cz: 1553
  github: 10,560
With Forks:
  repo.or.cz : 1349
  github : 16,021

Again, that is only the free, public projects - there are far more if you include the private projects as well. I understand that the commercial side that is necessitated by that is uncomforting to many people, but it is great for the adoption of Git. Otherwise, every company that wants to use Git professionally, including freelancers and consultants, would have to setup, manage and maintain their own git servers. It should not be a precondition that in order to use Git on a commercial project you either have to be a) a systems administrator capable of setting up and running your own server (and keeping it secure, etc), or b) part of an organization large enough to have a department to take care of that for you. Sure, you and I can do it, and it's easy for us, but that is not true of everyone.

Show 9 quoted lines
> I'd like to see the "official" Git homepage as distanced as possible from
> GitHub. They've taken Git (free as in speech, free as in beer) and built a
> closed-source commercial product on top of it -- curiously for something
> which you can do for free yourself anyway -- and as far as I can tell from
> observing this mailing list and watching the commits going into git.git,
> haven't ever contributed _anything_ back to the community. At least within
> the niche that is the Ruby/Rails community, GitHub has basically done a
> hijack job and managed to become synonymous with Git, supplanting it, and
> it's a trend that I wouldn't like to see continue.

Again, very few of us are excellent C programmers - I'm sure you wouldn't want any patches we have to offer there. We have spent considerable time and resources on things like gitcasts (which github sponsors for me), and on libraries and tools like ticgit (which is being included in the next Debian release) and Grit (a ruby/git library that runs Gitorious, and probably most other web-based Git repos), and will be contributing back improvements to ssh libraries that allow for the sort of traffic they have to deal with. They have also been looking to fund further open-source git related projects (in case any of you are interested, btw) :

http://github.com/blog/107-supercharged-ruby-git
Show 5 quoted lines
> Just my personal opinion, but GitHub doesn't provoke any warm fuzzy feelings
> here. Quite the contrary. I actively dislike it.
>
> Cheers,
> Wincent

I'm sorry you don't like us, but we're really not that bad. If you're in the SF bay area sometime, send me a note and I'll take you out for a beer and we can discuss what else we can do :)

Scott
Previous: Wincent ColaiutaNext: Junio C Hamano
Message 34 of 77 in “git-scm.com”
  1. Scott ChaconJul 25, 2008
  2. Sverre RabbelierJul 25, 2008
  3. Scott ChaconJul 25, 2008
  4. Johan HerlandJul 25, 2008
  5. Scott ChaconJul 25, 2008
  6. Stephan BeyerJul 25, 2008
  7. Scott ChaconJul 25, 2008
  8. Junio C HamanoJul 25, 2008
  9. Scott ChaconJul 26, 2008
  10. Junio C HamanoJul 26, 2008
  11. Peter Valdemar Mørch (Lists)Jul 27, 2008
  12. Petr BaudisJul 27, 2008
  13. Junio C HamanoJul 27, 2008
  14. Junio C HamanoJul 27, 2008
  15. Martin LanghoffJul 27, 2008
  16. Tom WernerJul 28, 2008
  17. Johannes SchindelinJul 28, 2008
  18. Tom WernerJul 28, 2008
  19. Jon LoeligerJul 31, 2008
  20. Kevin BallardJul 31, 2008
  21. Junio C HamanoJul 28, 2008
  22. Martin LanghoffJul 28, 2008
  23. Pieter de BieJul 28, 2008
  24. Shawn O. PearceJul 29, 2008
  25. Patrick AljordJul 26, 2008
  26. Scott ChaconJul 26, 2008
  27. Petr BaudisJul 26, 2008
  28. david@lang.hmJul 26, 2008
  29. Scott ChaconJul 26, 2008
  30. Patrick AljordJul 26, 2008
  31. Junio C HamanoJul 26, 2008
  32. david@lang.hmJul 26, 2008
  33. Wincent ColaiutaJul 26, 2008
  34. Scott ChaconJul 26, 2008
  35. Junio C HamanoJul 26, 2008
  36. Johannes SchindelinJul 26, 2008
  37. Official Git Homepage change? Re: git-scm.comPetr Baudis, Jul 26, 2008
  38. Petr BaudisJul 26, 2008
  39. Junio C HamanoJul 26, 2008
  40. Johannes SchindelinJul 26, 2008
  41. Junio C HamanoJul 26, 2008
  42. Johannes SchindelinJul 26, 2008
  43. Petr BaudisJul 26, 2008
  44. Junio C HamanoJul 26, 2008
  45. Thomas AdamJul 26, 2008
  46. Petr BaudisJul 27, 2008
  47. Johannes SchindelinJul 27, 2008
  48. Sverre RabbelierJul 27, 2008
  49. Scott ChaconJul 26, 2008
  50. Junio C HamanoJul 26, 2008
  51. Scott ChaconJul 26, 2008
  52. Sverre RabbelierJul 26, 2008
  53. Rene HermanJul 26, 2008
  54. Jakub NarebskiJul 26, 2008
  55. Scott ChaconJul 26, 2008
  56. Jakub NarebskiJul 26, 2008
  57. Petr BaudisJul 26, 2008
  58. Petr BaudisJul 26, 2008
  59. Jakub NarebskiJul 26, 2008
  60. Petr BaudisJul 26, 2008
  61. Jonas FonsecaAug 3, 2008
  62. Junio C HamanoAug 3, 2008
  63. Petr BaudisJul 27, 2008
  64. Scott ChaconJul 26, 2008
  65. Petr BaudisJul 26, 2008
  66. Johannes SchindelinJul 26, 2008
  67. Petr BaudisJul 26, 2008
  68. Stephan BeyerJul 26, 2008
  69. Johannes SchindelinJul 26, 2008
  70. Scott ChaconJul 26, 2008
  71. Martin LanghoffJul 26, 2008
  72. Jakub NarebskiJul 26, 2008
  73. Petr BaudisJul 26, 2008
  74. Junio C HamanoJul 26, 2008
  75. Scott ChaconJul 26, 2008
  76. Johannes SchindelinJul 26, 2008
  77. Scott ChaconJul 26, 2008

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.