Re: git-scm.com
- From
- Peter Valdemar Mørch (Lists) <4ux6as402@sneakemail.com>
- Date
- Jul 27, 2008, 06:19 UTC
- Message-ID
- <488C1362.4010608@sneakemail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vsktwfu5z.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
As a contributer with a single commit I was happy to see myself appear shortly on the list (yeah!). Ok, so I realize it is vanity and a little silly... :-)
Junio C Hamano gitster-at-pobox.com |Lists| wrote:
> I have a mild suspicion that sorting that list in alphabetical order may > actually make it much better. It all depends on the purpose of that list, > though.
To me it makes sense to sort the entire list according to commits. Its still easy to find anybody with search, and I find it appropriate that I be towards the end. The commit sorting encourages me to move up the list! :-D
> And for the "giving credit" purpose, I do not think truncating the list at > 5 commits or less threshold, as suggested earlier and already done, makes > much sense, either.
And why truncate the list? I'd personally like to be back on the list (vanity! - but true), bandwidth is relatively cheap, and there is nothing below the list. I also think it makes the community look healty and encourages contribution to see how many others contribute.
Peter
-- Peter Valdemar Mørch http://www.morch.com