Re: git-scm.com
- From
Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
- Date
- Jul 26, 2008, 13:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080726130757.GY32184@machine.or.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <m3hcadul6j.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 01:03:26AM -0700, Jakub Narebski wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> "Scott Chacon" <schacon@gmail.com> writes: > > > A followup on the post I did a few days ago about Git documentation. > > I forked Petr's git.or.cz site and put up a version that I think is a > > bit more accessible and newbie-friendly at git-scm.com. I had meant > > to discuss this with Petr before posting it to you all, but I > > published a blog post that got a bit more attention than I expected, > > and I didn't want you all to think I didn't care about your opinion, > > as some have already accused me of. > > On thing I am curious about: how do you plan to have current version > of Git in the download / last version section? Petr Baudis uses > custom script, which search git mailing list for "[ANNOUNCE]" posts, > and automatically updates download / last version links.
Actually, I scan the last tag on maint branch using git descirbe; the ANNOUNCE posts are scanned by the RSS feed. Originally, git-scm scanned kernel.org download directory for the latest tarball, but it seemed that would break on something like the 1.4.4.5, so it also moved to the git describe method:
http://repo.or.cz/w/git-homepage.git?a=blob;f=update.sh http://github.com/schacon/learn-github/tree/master/script/get_version.rb
One Scott's concern that didn't occur to me was that a the time of release, we could have broken links between the time tag is created and tarballs are wrapped up. I *think* that in practice, this happens at the same time, I wonder if Junio could confirm that.
-- Petr "Pasky" Baudis As in certain cults it is possible to kill a process if you know its true name. -- Ken Thompson and Dennis M. Ritchie