Re: [doc] User Manual Suggestion
- From
Mark Lodato <lodatom@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 3, 2009, 01:18 UTC
- Message-ID
- <ca433830905021818v5c99cce4q57902eba8ff3d7fc@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <b4087cc50905021613j1d269757g8c599b484208c188@mail.gmail.com>
2009/5/2 Michael Witten <mfwitten@gmail.com>:
> I also dislike the use of 'name' rather than 'hash'; a name is > something provided by the user, but a hash is something computed. The > use of sha[-]1 is even more egregious.
What about "identifier" as a compromise between "hash" and "name"? This is really what we're talking about - a way of identifying objects.