Re: Thunderbird and patches
- From
Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
- Date
- Feb 12, 2009, 04:37 UTC
- Message-ID
- <buo4oz0e0dg.fsf@dhlpc061.dev.necel.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <499151C9.7090502@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
>> In other words: use the right tool. Or, as somebody put it at the >> GitTogether: to a hammer, everything looks like a nail. > > It just seems that the workflow "required" here on the git list is the > way it is because it caters for differently abled MUAs which can't > handle certain standards (inline disposition) efficiently. Mutt > obviously can, so it's not a matter of John Doe's MUA versus geeky > MUAs.
So, since you decry flames later in your message, why did you feel it necessary to throw in this rather creaky bit of flamebait?
[The issue is apparently MUAs which munge messages when not wanted; that says _nothing_ about what non-munging MUAs can or can not "handle".]
-Miles
-- Mayonnaise, n. One of the sauces that serve the French in place of a state religion.