Re: [PATCH v2] Enable setting attach as the default in .gitconfig for git-format-patch.

From: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Date: Feb 9, 2009, 13:50 UTC
Message-ID: <49903491.7000509@drmicha.warpmail.net>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0902091433270.10279@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>

Johannes Schindelin venit, vidit, dixit 09.02.2009 14:36:

Show 31 quoted lines

> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Ben Bucksch wrote:
> 
>> On 09.02.2009 13:34, Michael J Gruber wrote:
>>> Johannes Schindelin venit, vidit, dixit 08.02.2009 18:28:
>>>    
>>>> On Sun, 8 Feb 2009, Jeremy White wrote
>>>>> Essentially, the problem is well understood - Thunderbird uses
>>>>> format=flowed by default, which is what mangles the patches.
>>>>>        
>>>> I guess I'll start discouraging use of Thunderbird from now on.
>> Or you could just publish:
>> 1. Prefs | Advanced | General | Config Editor...
>> 2. "mailnews.send_plaintext_flowed" = false
> 
> Ah.  Mhm...
> 
>> As inline attachments, they'll show up inline in the msg viewer as well 
> 
> ... which is a moot point, as the responder has to do extra work to quote 
> the stuff.  Definitely not my type of friendliness.
> 
>>> I found git-send-email the more reliable and practical solution for 
>>> sending out patches. Put yourself in bcc and you'll have a copy in 
>>> TB's inbox or another folder (use filters).
>> Yup, I think that's the best way - git is using email only as protocol, so
>> it's good to have special clients to that, as it's a really special use.
> 
> Aha.  And putting extra comments in (manually) does not count.  'cause I 
> do not see send-email allowing that.

There is this useful thingy called "vim" which lets you edit the 00* files... Come on, Dscho ;)

Show 13 quoted lines

>>> <sarcasm style="reality: exaggerated;">
>>> Isn't that some Linux guy? How would he matter for Mozilla? Does he even
>>> know how to send HTML mail...
>>> </sarcasm>
>>>    
>> I don't think it's a matter of clue, it's a matter of background and 
>> attitude.
> 
> Yeah, I think my background dictates that I stay by my word and recommend 
> other mailers than Thunderbird.
> 
> It is one thing to be nice to the "average" user, but another one to be 
> unfriendly to the people making the internet revolution possible.

I think Ben made it clear why "format flowed" is the default, and there are numerous posts in the TB/moz community which make it clear why they spell it "format flawed". The default will not change.

I thought about writing an extension which let's you change the config on a per message basis. (You can already do it per folder using mnenhy, I suppose.) But then I still have to navigate from TB to my repo and include the output of git-format-patch, or dump it to an mbox (or upload to an imap drafts folder).

So, even with f-f issues out of the way I would find git-send-email (+vim) to be the right tool for the job. Which is why I use it, for sending patches by e-mail, not for corresponding by e-mail.

So, let's be peaceful, and talk about Mozilla's choice of hg instead ;) [No, please don't!]

Michael