Re: Thunderbird and patches (was Re: [PATCH v2] Enable setting attach as the default in .gitconfig for git-format-patch.)
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Feb 9, 2009, 20:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0902092105230.10279@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <RD8dEuXN_TYvtiDHum-mdwL3m_eJP49xWrl9-YgiLfhOFN6weRXVhg@cipher.nrlssc.navy.mil>
Hi,
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Brandon Casey wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Ben Bucksch wrote: > > > >> On 09.02.2009 19:54, Brandon Casey wrote: > >>> I will follow up with an example patch which has the control > >>> characters in it. > > > > You can use a mailer such as Alpine, which has no problems with patches > > like that whatsoever. > > Yes, that's my work-around. Though it's pine, we're not modern enough to > have alpine.
BTW it seems that a few people misunderstood my comments.
Just to clarify: I am happy if a lot of non-technical people use Thunderbird. I mean, I am happy for them.
If it is too complicated for Thunderbird to accomodate the workflow required on our mailing list, however, I will have to recommend another tool to the people who want to contribute to Git.
I would not recommend emacs to a vim user, either. Or vice versa.
In other words: use the right tool. Or, as somebody put it at the GitTogether: to a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
Ciao, Dscho