Re: master^ is not a local branch -- huh?!?
- From
Michael Witten <mfwitten@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 30, 2010, 00:38 UTC
- Message-ID
- <b4087cc51001291638y5620eb3epd86efe577ab7adb1@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7viqakcu56.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> The "state" was not about the work-tree state, but about the > "detached HEAD" state, which I didn't make it clear.
Maybe we should just introduce people to a more explicit command like the hypothetical 'update' command I sketch here:
http://marc.info/?l=git&m=126481166426896&w=2