Re: master^ is not a local branch -- huh?!?
- From
- Ron Garret <ron1@flownet.com>
- Date
- Jan 30, 2010, 08:56 UTC
- Message-ID
- <ron1-817AFC.00562230012010@news.gmane.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vhbq4xbok.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In article <7vhbq4xbok.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Ron Garret <ron1@flownet.com> writes: > > > It wouldn't. Was this a trick question? Did you mean to ask what would > > happen if I ran commit -a? > > I didn't mean _literally_ "git commit". Any random thing you may want to > do when you come back to work the next day and find a checked out work > tree. Viewing, editing, committing, etc.
Then I really don't understand the issue. I'd be in a situation that is no different from (in fact indistinguishable from) having manually edited my code so that it looks like an earlier checked-in version. What's the problem?
rg