Re: master^ is not a local branch -- huh?!?
- From
A Large Angry SCM <gitzilla@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 29, 2010, 23:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4B636C3B.8040308@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <fabb9a1e1001291332w1d161f8at58aa6fe6908bd77f@mail.gmail.com>
Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> Heya, > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 22:29, Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net> wrote: >> Then who was arguing about making Git more user friendly rather >> then less? > > Using a detached head is a more advanced feature than wanting to > checkout a remote branch locally, creating a local tracking branch. As > such, 'git checkout origin/topic' now means the same as 'git checkout > -t origin/topic', and you can get the old behavior back by doing 'git > checkout origin/topic^0'. I don't see what the problem is, if you're > using a detached head you're an advanced enough git user that you can > remember that you can use '^0' to detach your head. It's not all that > uncommon to do 'git checkout HEAD^0' to detach your head to the > current branch, no? >
[I'm still catching up on this thread]
What we call 'Detached head' is _the_ normal way ti use git for quite a number of users. And given the current UI, it's not really advanced.