From: Michael Witten Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:38:32 GMT Subject: Re: master^ is not a local branch -- huh?!? Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <7viqakcu56.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > The "state" was not about the work-tree state, but about the > "detached HEAD" state, which I didn't make it clear. Maybe we should just introduce people to a more explicit command like the hypothetical 'update' command I sketch here: http://marc.info/?l=git&m=126481166426896&w=2