git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH v8 3/3] replay: offer an option to linearize the commit topology

From
Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>
Date
Aug 7, 2026, 17:34 UTC
Message-ID
<anYLeQj4Sx2vZqvy@denethor>
In-Reply-To
<20260728-toon-git-replay-drop-merges-v8-3-ced11dffe749@iotcl.com>
On 26/07/28 05:45PM, Toon Claes wrote:
Show 15 quoted lines
> One of the stated goals of git-replay(1) is to allow implementing the
> git-rebase(1) functionality on the server side.
> 
> The default mode of git-rebase(1) is to act as if `--no-rebase-merges`
> was given. This mode drops merge commits instead of replaying them, and
> linearizes the history into a sequence of regular (single-parent)
> commits.
> 
> Add option `--linearize` to git-replay(1) to do the same. Each replayed
> commit is stacked on top of the previously replayed one. When a merge is
> encountered, the commits reachable from all of its sides are replayed
> into the single line and the merge itself is dropped.
> 
> If a ref was pointing to a merge commit, that ref is updated to the
> merge's last replayed ancestor.

Just to clarify, does it really matter if the ref was pointing to the merge commit directly? I assume it is just "flattening" the merge commits in the revision range.

> git-replay(1) accepts multiple revision ranges, for example:
> 
>     $ git replay --onto main topic1 topic2

Per some discussion earlier in the thread, is "accepts multiple revision ranges" the correct wording here? Would it be more correct to say multiple branches instead?

> Without `--linearize` this replays 'topic1' and 'topic2' onto 'main'
> independently and updates both refs.
Ok, so git-replay(1) updates each branch sepecified separately.
Show 6 quoted lines
> For now this is disallowed with option `--linearize`. Linearizing more
> than one branch at once would concatenate unrelated histories into a
> single line, and update each branch to some point in that line. That
> won't be the result most users want, especially because the order
> depends on the order of the revision walk, not the order of the branch
> names on the command line.

I'm not quite sure I follow. Why would the inclusion of the `--linearize` option force concatenation of multiple references? Is it mot possible to linearize each of the branches in isolation and update the reference accordingly?

Show 6 quoted lines
> For the same reason disallow the use of `--contained` with
> `--linearize`.
> 
> Users who want to linearize multiple branches are advised to do this in
> separate git-replay(1) invocations. Linearizing multiple branches at
> once might be added later.
Ok.
Show 49 quoted lines
> Note that `--linearize` is not modeled after git-rebase(1)'s
> `--rebase-merges[=<mode>]` interface. Recreating merges, by preserving
> their topology, is a distinct operation that would be a separate mode.
> `--linearize` only drops merges and replays commits linearly. So
> git-replay(1) uses its own option rather than reusing that interface.
> 
> Based-on-patches-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
> Signed-off-by: Toon Claes <toon@iotcl.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/git-replay.adoc |  19 +++++++-
>  builtin/replay.c              |   6 ++-
>  replay.c                      |  60 +++++++++++++++--------
>  replay.h                      |   5 ++
>  t/t3650-replay-basics.sh      | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  5 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-replay.adoc b/Documentation/git-replay.adoc
> index a32f72aead..656a6924d9 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-replay.adoc
> +++ b/Documentation/git-replay.adoc
> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ SYNOPSIS
>  --------
>  [verse]
>  (EXPERIMENTAL!) 'git replay' ([--contained] --onto=<newbase> | --advance=<branch> | --revert=<branch>)
> -			     [--ref=<ref>] [--ref-action=<mode>] <revision-range>
> +			     [--ref=<ref>] [--ref-action=<mode>] [--linearize] <revision-range>
>  
>  DESCRIPTION
>  -----------
> @@ -88,6 +88,23 @@ incompatible with `--contained` (which is a modifier for `--onto` only).
>  +
>  The default mode can be configured via the `replay.refAction` configuration variable.
>  
> +--linearize::
> +	In this mode, each replayed commit is stacked on top of the
> +	previously replayed one, so all replayed commits are flattened into
> +	a single linear history.
> ++
> +When a merge commit is encountered, the behavior of git-rebase(1)'s
> +option `--no-rebase-merges` is imitated. All commits in the range
> +reachable from the merge commit are replayed into a linear history, and
> +the merge commit itself is dropped. A ref that pointed to a merge commit
> +is updated to the merge's last replayed ancestor.
> ++
> +Only a single branch can be linearized at a time: `--linearize` cannot
> +be combined with multiple positive revisions or with `--contained`,
> +because that would concatenate otherwise unrelated histories into one
> +line. To linearize several branches, replay them in separate `git
> +replay` invocations.

I still don't fully understand the justification here. I'm not sure it really needs to be in the documentation though. It may be fine to just say "multiple branches are not supported with this option" or something along those lines.

Show 46 quoted lines
> +
>  <revision-range>::
>  	Range of commits to replay; see "Specifying Ranges" in
>  	linkgit:git-rev-parse[1]. In `--advance=<branch>` or
> diff --git a/builtin/replay.c b/builtin/replay.c
> index 39e3a86f6c..d39626a37d 100644
> --- a/builtin/replay.c
> +++ b/builtin/replay.c
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ int cmd_replay(int argc,
>  	const char *const replay_usage[] = {
>  		N_("(EXPERIMENTAL!) git replay "
>  		   "([--contained] --onto=<newbase> | --advance=<branch> | --revert=<branch>)\n"
> -		   "[--ref=<ref>] [--ref-action=<mode>] <revision-range>"),
> +		   "[--ref=<ref>] [--ref-action=<mode>] [--linearize] <revision-range>"),
>  		NULL
>  	};
>  	struct option replay_options[] = {
> @@ -111,6 +111,8 @@ int cmd_replay(int argc,
>  			     N_("mode"),
>  			     N_("control ref update behavior (update|print)"),
>  			     PARSE_OPT_NONEG),
> +		OPT_BOOL(0, "linearize", &opts.linearize,
> +			 N_("drop merge commits, replaying only non-merge commits")),
>  		OPT_END()
>  	};
>  
> @@ -132,6 +134,8 @@ int cmd_replay(int argc,
>  				  opts.contained, "--contained");
>  	die_for_incompatible_opt2(!!opts.ref, "--ref",
>  				  !!opts.contained, "--contained");
> +	die_for_incompatible_opt2(opts.linearize, "--linearize",
> +				  !!opts.contained, "--contained");
>  
>  	/* Parse ref action mode from command line or config */
>  	ref_mode = get_ref_action_mode(repo, ref_action);
> diff --git a/replay.c b/replay.c
> index 7e35f40d37..1e1bc7c10a 100644
> --- a/replay.c
> +++ b/replay.c
> @@ -404,6 +404,12 @@ int replay_revisions(struct rev_info *revs,
>  	set_up_replay_mode(revs->repo, &revs->cmdline, opts->onto,
>  			   &detached_head, &advance, &revert, &onto, &update_refs);
>  
> +	if (opts->linearize &&
> +	    update_refs && strset_get_size(update_refs) > 1) {
> +		ret = error(_("'--linearize' cannot be used with multiple revision ranges"));
Should this say "multiple branches" instead?
Show 42 quoted lines
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (opts->ref) {
>  		struct object_id oid;
>  
> @@ -437,26 +443,40 @@ int replay_revisions(struct rev_info *revs,
>  	while ((commit = get_revision(revs))) {
>  		const struct name_decoration *decoration;
>  
> -		/*
> -		 * Decide where to replay this commit on.
> -		 * If the parent commit was replayed already, the replayed result
> -		 * can be found in `replayed_commits`. Otherwise fall back to `onto`.
> -		 * When reverting, commits are replayed in reverse order and thus
> -		 * its parent isn't replayed yet. Therefore revert commits are
> -		 * always replayed onto `last_commit`.
> -		 */
> -		struct commit *parent = commit->parents ? commit->parents->item : NULL;
> -		struct commit *base = get_mapped_commit(replayed_commits, parent, onto);
> -
> -		if (mode == REPLAY_MODE_REVERT)
> -			base = last_commit;
> -
> -		if (commit->parents && commit->parents->next)
> -			die(_("replaying merge commits is not supported yet!"));
> -
> -		last_commit = pick_regular_commit(revs->repo, commit, base,
> -						  &merge_opt, &result,
> -						  mode, opts->empty);
> +		if (commit->parents && commit->parents->next) {
> +			if (!opts->linearize)
> +				die(_("replaying merge commits is not supported yet!"));
> +			/*
> +			 * Drop the merge commit: do not pick it, leave
> +			 * `last_commit` unchanged, and fall through to the
> +			 * rest of the loop. As a result:
> +			 * - refs pointing to the merge commit will be updated
> +			 *   to `last_commit`.
> +			 * - the next replayed commit uses `last_commit` as its
> +			 *   `base`.
> +			 */

Ok, when the linearize option is provided, we now drop the merge commit and continue on.

Show 16 quoted lines
> +		} else {
> +			/*
> +			 * Decide where to replay this commit onto.
> +			 * If the parent commit was replayed already, the replayed result
> +			 * can be found in `replayed_commits`. Otherwise fall back to `onto`.
> +			 * When reverting, commits are replayed in reverse order and thus
> +			 * its parent isn't replayed yet. Therefore revert commits are
> +			 * always replayed onto `last_commit`.
> +			 * Also when opts->linearize is true, set the base to
> +			 * `last_commit` to create a single linear history.
> +			 */
> +			struct commit *parent = commit->parents ? commit->parents->item : NULL;
> +			struct commit *base = get_mapped_commit(replayed_commits, parent, onto);
> +
> +			if (opts->linearize || mode == REPLAY_MODE_REVERT)
> +				base = last_commit;

Ok IIUC, when we are linearizing commits we are just replaying them onto the most recently replayed commit. Makes sense.

-Justin
Previous: Toon ClaesNext: Elijah Newren
Message 67 of 75 in “Teach git-replay(1) to linearize merge commits”
  1. 0/3 Teach git-replay(1) to linearize merge commitsToon Claes, Jun 8, 2026
  2. 1/3 replay: refactor enum replay_mode into a boolToon Claes, Jun 8, 2026
  3. 2/3 replay: add helper to put entry into mapped_commitsToon Claes, Jun 8, 2026
  4. 3/3 replay: offer an option to linearize the commit topologyToon Claes, Jun 8, 2026
  5. Junio C HamanoJun 8, 2026
  6. Toon ClaesJun 10, 2026
  7. 0/3 Teach git-replay(1) to linearize merge commitsToon Claes, Jun 10, 2026
  8. 1/3 replay: refactor enum replay_mode into a boolToon Claes, Jun 10, 2026
  9. Justin ToblerJun 11, 2026
  10. Toon ClaesJun 12, 2026
  11. 2/3 replay: add helper to put entry into mapped_commitsToon Claes, Jun 10, 2026
  12. 3/3 replay: offer an option to linearize the commit topologyToon Claes, Jun 10, 2026
  13. Junio C HamanoJun 10, 2026
  14. Toon ClaesJun 16, 2026
  15. Elijah NewrenJun 14, 2026
  16. Toon ClaesJun 16, 2026
  17. 0/3 Teach git-replay(1) to linearize merge commitsToon Claes, Jun 16, 2026
  18. 1/3 replay: refactor enum replay_mode into a boolToon Claes, Jun 16, 2026
  19. 2/3 replay: add helper to put entry into mapped_commitsToon Claes, Jun 16, 2026
  20. 3/3 replay: offer an option to linearize the commit topologyToon Claes, Jun 16, 2026
  21. 0/3 Teach git-replay(1) to linearize merge commitsToon Claes, Jun 22, 2026
  22. 1/3 replay: refactor enum replay_mode into a boolToon Claes, Jun 22, 2026
  23. Patrick SteinhardtJun 22, 2026
  24. Junio C HamanoJun 22, 2026
  25. Toon ClaesJun 24, 2026
  26. 2/3 replay: add helper to put entry into mapped_commitsToon Claes, Jun 22, 2026
  27. Patrick SteinhardtJun 22, 2026
  28. 3/3 replay: offer an option to linearize the commit topologyToon Claes, Jun 22, 2026
  29. Patrick SteinhardtJun 22, 2026
  30. Toon ClaesJun 26, 2026
  31. Patrick SteinhardtJun 29, 2026
  32. Johannes SchindelinJun 30, 2026
  33. Patrick SteinhardtJun 30, 2026
  34. 0/3 Teach git-replay(1) to linearize merge commitsToon Claes, Jun 26, 2026
  35. 1/3 replay: add helper to put entry into mapped_commitsToon Claes, Jun 26, 2026
  36. Junio C HamanoJun 26, 2026
  37. 2/3 replay: better explain how pick_regular_commit() picks a baseToon Claes, Jun 26, 2026
  38. 3/3 replay: offer an option to linearize the commit topologyToon Claes, Jun 26, 2026
  39. Junio C HamanoJun 26, 2026
  40. Phillip WoodJun 27, 2026
  41. Toon ClaesJul 1, 2026
  42. Johannes SchindelinJun 28, 2026
  43. Toon ClaesJun 30, 2026
  44. 0/3 Teach git-replay(1) to linearize merge commitsToon Claes, Jul 2, 2026
  45. 1/3 replay: add helper to put entry into replayed_commitsToon Claes, Jul 2, 2026
  46. 2/3 replay: resolve the replay base outside pick_regular_commit()Toon Claes, Jul 2, 2026
  47. 3/3 replay: offer an option to linearize the commit topologyToon Claes, Jul 2, 2026
  48. Junio C HamanoJul 3, 2026
  49. Toon ClaesJul 7, 2026
  50. Junio C HamanoJul 7, 2026
  51. 0/3 Teach git-replay(1) to linearize merge commitsToon Claes, Jul 7, 2026
  52. 1/3 replay: add helper to put entry into replayed_commitsToon Claes, Jul 7, 2026
  53. 2/3 replay: resolve the replay base outside pick_regular_commit()Toon Claes, Jul 7, 2026
  54. 3/3 replay: offer an option to linearize the commit topologyToon Claes, Jul 7, 2026
  55. Elijah NewrenJul 10, 2026
  56. Junio C HamanoJul 13, 2026
  57. Elijah NewrenJul 15, 2026
  58. Junio C HamanoJul 15, 2026
  59. Elijah NewrenJul 16, 2026
  60. Junio C HamanoJul 17, 2026
  61. Toon ClaesJul 27, 2026
  62. Junio C HamanoJul 8, 2026
  63. 0/3 Teach git-replay(1) to linearize merge commitsToon Claes, Jul 28, 2026
  64. 1/3 replay: add helper to put entry into replayed_commitsToon Claes, Jul 28, 2026
  65. 2/3 replay: resolve the replay base outside pick_regular_commit()Toon Claes, Jul 28, 2026
  66. 3/3 replay: offer an option to linearize the commit topologyToon Claes, Jul 28, 2026
  67. Justin ToblerAug 7, 2026
  68. Elijah NewrenAug 8, 2026
  69. Toon ClaesAug 31, 2026
  70. Junio C HamanoJul 28, 2026
  71. 0/3 Teach git-replay(1) to linearize merge commitsToon Claes, Aug 31, 2026
  72. 1/3 replay: add helper to put entry into replayed_commitsToon Claes, Aug 31, 2026
  73. 2/3 replay: resolve the replay base outside pick_regular_commit()Toon Claes, Aug 31, 2026
  74. 3/3 replay: offer an option to linearize the commit topologyToon Claes, Aug 31, 2026
  75. Elijah NewrenSep 1, 2026

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.