Re: [PATCH] Add platform-independent .git "symlink"
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Feb 5, 2008, 12:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LSU.1.00.0802051256080.8543@racer.site>
- In-Reply-To
- <47A7CD29.40306@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Hi,
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Brandon Casey wrote:
Show 18 quoted lines
> Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Brandon Casey wrote: > > > >> If your statement above is rephrased to "I _want_ the original > >> repository to know that it has conjoined siblings.", then we have a > >> new repository type: > >> > >> 4) conjoined repository (it has multiple sibling repositories each > >> with their own working directory, but they all share and modify the > >> same .git directory) > > > > No. The repository does not even need a working directory (in which case > > we call it "bare"). > > The additional term "bare" that is used with such a repository without a > working directory implies to me that this is a "special" or "uncommon" > repository configuration.
By the same reasoning, a "good day" would be a "special" or "uncommon" day.
> So I hope you excuse me for referring to the result of git-clone as a > repository. I'll try to think of something else to call it (above I used > repo/workdir).
But that's what I am saying: a git-clone clones a repository. If you happen to clone without the "--bare" option, it will additionally create a working directory.
Hth, Dscho