Re: [PATCH] Add platform-independent .git "symlink"
- From
- Lars Hjemli <hjemli@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 4, 2008, 11:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <8c5c35580802040359v1a5d8c42xfbc592245a8917c2@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LSU.1.00.0802040024030.7372@racer.site>
On Feb 4, 2008 1:24 AM, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > For now I haven't picked up any of the "how about this way" > > revisions. > > Yeah, I think all my comments have been addressed... Lars, care to send a > new version?
Sure, but we should come to a conclusion on "GITDIR" vs. "GIT_DIR" vs. "gitdir" vs. "directory" vs. "ref". The reason I used "GITDIR" was to keep the door open for additional parameters in the "gitfile" (but it should obviously have been "GIT_DIR" for that usage since its value is used to specify $GIT_DIR). If it's more likely that we'll use this as a general substitute for symlinks, I think "ref" is better due to the existing symbolic refs.
My preference would be "GIT_DIR" (or "git_dir") since we also might want the "WORKDIR_HASH" Shawn mentioned.
-- larsh